Do these jeans make my butt look fat?

No, honey, your butt is just fat, it’s not the jeans, trust me!

No woman in her right mind should ever ask her man that question. And no man who values his masculinity would ever give that answer.

I never ask, and my honey never answers. I know I need to lose a few – read here – however, I also know that clothes can and do make the woman.

I spend a lot of time in jeans, and I really have this thing against “Mom Jeans” – those usually comfortable but terribly unflattering and downright matronly looking things that can transform even a svelte, sexy young thing into a decidedly dowdy “Mom” with the swish of a zipper. Since I already bear distinct resemblance to the quintessential suburban housewife (though I do not, and will never, sport the “Soccer Mom” ‘do!) I figure I do not need any additional help via denim.

Thus my quest for the “perfect pair of jeans” – in my world “perfect” means they are snug enough to look “tight, but either stretchy enough, or loose enough that I can still move and breathe in them, they also must not come up over my belly button, be reasonably “cool” looking, not give me the dreaded muffin top, boot cut, long enough to wear with heels (what, you thought I meant cowboy boots? C’mon! Who are you talking about here?) They must also be comfortable.

Oh, and perhaps most importantly, not make my ass look any bigger than it actually is.

And every female reading this has just fallen out of her chair, laughing her head off and gasping, between guffaws of uncontrolled hysterics, “She’s got to be kidding, right? Such jeans just do not exist in this universe!”

Well, yes, they do, and I found them.

I tend to buy ONE pair of a particular type of jeans – trying them out in real life, not just in the fitting room, until I am convinced they are worthy of wearing. Then, when I finally decide they are straight from heaven, I go to buy several pairs, usually finding they have since been discontinued, or worse, “improved” in some way that may be an improvement to somebody but certainly is not to me.

And so, ask me how thrilled I was when the pair of jeans that in the dressing room had seemed just a tad snug (read - I couldn’t breathe) after washing proved to be the epitome of perfection. Now, ask me if I’m going to quickly go buy a few more pair of them before they decide to “improve” these as well.

PS - for the record, yes, that is my butt and no there was not a gun to my head when I decided to put that shot on this blog. It just seemed the best way to illustrate my point - ample rear and all.

PPS - yes, I’ve done a few posts today - it so happens I have the time, finally, to put up some stuff I’ve been working on. It also so happens that I will likely not have the time to do so in the next couple of days. Though, I’ve got a major rant coming up about a certain household behavior!

Who gave me all of this crap?

Have you ever wondered about those gifts from the song “The 12 Days of Christmas”?

And since the lines repeat, does that mean that on Day 1, the lover gave a Partridge in a Pear Tree, and on Day 2, gave Two Turtle Doves and yet another Partridge in a Pear Tree, etc, etc, ad infinitum on down the line?

And I know I’ve seen some humorous thing regarding this - about getting sick of all the birds, the extra people around the house, the noise, the mess, etc. And filing a restraining order.

But, since I am not the type to leave well enough alone - I simply had to take my own twisted look at that lovely song. Most of us have probably heard or read some version of that parody/humor/whatever piece, and I decided it was time to look not at the gifts themselves, but at the aftermath of the gifts. Assuming that the gifts do, indeed repeat, here is my own take of “After the 12 Days of Christmas”. And so without further ado, here it is, my look at the sheer numbers represented.

The basic math:

The gift from Day one was received 12 times, and the gift from Day 12 was received only one time. So, the formula:

Number of times the gift was received X the number of items listed as the gift = Total items.

1 x 12 = 12 Drummers Drumming

2 x 11 = 22 Pipers Piping

3 x 10 = 30 Lords a-leaping

4 x 9 = 36 Ladies Dancing

5 x 8 = 40 Maids a-Milking

6 x 7 = 42 Swans a-Swimming

7 x 6 = 42 Geese a-Laying

8 x 5 = 40 Golden Rings

9 x 4 = 36 Calling Birds

10 x 3 = 30 French Hens

11 x 2 = 22 Turtle Doves

12 x 1 = 12 Partridges in Pear Trees

 

And the counts:

140 people (12+22+30+36+40)

184 Birds (42+42+36+30+22+12)

40 Golden Rings (40)

40 Cows or Goats (40 Maids a-Milking have to be milking something)

294 Goose Eggs (42 Geese a-Laying are laying at least one egg each per day for 7 days of the song - this number would obviously increase over time - unless you cook the geese, always a smart option.)

Unknown quantity of Pears (after all, 12 pear trees have to be producing SOME amount of fruit - but I am not familiar with how much a single pear tree would produce in a given amount of time.)

Unknown quantities of milk (those cows or goats being milked by the maids are producing some sort of product, right?)

This is of course not taking into account the 22 pipes being played, 12 drums being drummed, the lake, pond or tub for all those swimming swans and all of the cages or pens for the various bird life, not to mention the activity of the leaping lords and dancing ladies.

It is also not taking into account the amorous activities of any of the various bird life, and their potential offspring. Though we know there won’t be any geese or cows/goats, since they’re all girls (Since male geese do not lay eggs, last time I checked.) That still leaves the potential swans, calling birds, French hens, turtle doves and perhaps partridges. Please note, I said nothing of the critters being milked, since once again, they must all be of the female variety.

Oh yes, I’ve overlooked one gift item. The 40 golden rings, which had better be very large and weighty indeed in order to offset the cost of dealing with all the other junk.

So, what does one do with such an abundance of wealth?

You could argue that you could cook the birds to feed the people, though with 184 birds and 140 people, this would not work for long. You could cook the cows or goats, but again - that will only last for so long (and since, like the geese, they are not reproducing, they are not a renewable resource.)

The smart recipient would therefore:

~Promptly dismiss all of the people from service - ridding themselves of the need to support 140 hungry mouths, only 40 of which are really employed in any productive activity (I realize that piping and drumming are jobs, but…)

~Sell all but two of the cows or goats, keeping one to be butchered and one to be milked. (OK, you might retain one of those Maids a-Milking for this purpose.)

~Prepare and freeze about half of the edible poultry, if you like goose eggs, keep a couple for laying, and sell the remaining poultry.

~Plant a pear tree or two and sell the rest.

~Keep the gold rings you like and sell the remainder

Did I forget anything?

Powered by Qumana

Sex is power?

Note - I am posting this as part of a little journey of self - certain  “issues”, which shall, for now, stay silent, have prompted me to not only look at my past, but to actually question the why of it. Call it growing up - finally.

My first (consensual) sexual encounters were of the typical teenage variety - fumbling around with fellatio and then a furtive, half-dressed consummation in a treehouse. It didn’t rock my word, but it was fun and it opened my eyes to something seemingly important: sex is power.

Thanks to a past history of abuse, my views of sexuality, and my personal sexual development did not follow the “norm” - to me, this discovery that sex equaled power was momentous. It gave me something I had previously lacked: control. It gave me a sense of being in charge, of making my own choices, of having power over someone else without them controlling me.

I dove into this discovery head first, never realizing that it did not offer the freedom I believed it did, but instead wove an intricate cage to form my prison.

Girls of my own age hated me. They sensed this awakening in me, they knew it was different than their own early explorations, and they were intimidated by a fully sexually aware peer, even though they did not realize that was the source of the problem. I remember one girl saying to me, “I hate the way you walk.” That baffled me for years.

Guys of my own age were intimidated by me. They wanted a girl who quietly acquiesced to their teenage desires after much coercion on their part; one who “let them” do things. They didn’t know what was different about me, only that there was something there that was beyond them. On the one hand, they wanted, on the other, they were afraid. Guys don’t like that feeling.

During high school, I wasn’t called a slut, or thought of as “easy” - I never dated boys in my school, I rarely dated school-age guys anyway. None of my peers were aware of my sexual activities, but like the pack animals that teenagers are, they sensed something - I had some knowledge they did not and they resented it.

Those attitudes actually persisted into college, where I found people of my own age still fumbling in the dark and unaware of their own sexuality. They were still dabbling on the edges of the pool, dipping their toes in, perhaps even wading, where as I had swum out into the depths, and had dove fully to the bottom.

I don’t claim to be proud of my youthful activities - it is simply a part of who I am. And I don’t claim to have been better than my peers - in fact, quite the opposite, I believe my early sexual awakening kept me from understanding deeper and more important issues.

I learned, through the years, that I could get what I wanted through sex. My few girlfriends joked that the “good” guys were all either taken, gay or head over heels for me. It’s not that I was prettier than they, or smarter, or anything else. It was that I understood male sexuality and desire and could, would and did satisfy it - to a degree that had my partners completely and utterly at my feet - even if I had not “slept with” them. It was the potential promise, the flirtatious awareness, the desire and willingness they felt.

I happily used sex to get what I wanted. And there is the dark side of this picture. Thanks to that history, I felt I had no value aside from what I could provide through sex. I could not feel loved except through sex. When I did not have a sexual relationship with a man, I didn’t understand him, I couldn’t control him, and I didn’t feel loved by him.

My entire image of myself was wrapped up in, and warped by, my sexuality.

There it was, what seemed at first to be power and freedom was actually a cage built by my own actions. I didn’t understand how to define myself outside of my sexuality. I didn’t have any sense of self without that.

There is no point in describing chapter and verse of my life and mistakes. But I learned lessons over the years, slowly coming to the understanding that sex was indeed powerful, and did equal power, true - but it could also warp and twist, it was power that consumed rather than fulfilled.

Now, many years and some hard life lessons later, I am finally understanding myself, finally no longer defined by my sexuality, but fully embracing it, no longer controlled by it, or controlling with it - but instead reveling in the full confidence of a woman for whom sex is an expression of love, not a means to attain it.

And that, I believe, is the true “power” in sex.

Tags: , ,

Powered by Qumana

Educating Roxy…

The process of divorce has taught me some rather significant lessons about myself - some of them, I’m still not too sure how to process and fully integrate into my life while others felt like putting on an old comfortable shoe - it just fits. Learning about myself as a "feminist" is one of those things that I don’t yet understand…

All my life I grew up with the dichotomy of strong, independent women who were never-the-less still incredibly feminine and who treated the men in their lives like gods. I was encouraged to be both brainy and beautiful.

As I got older and began to understand a bit more of the world, I took "equality" for granted. I didn’t see the strides women had made, because to me there was no inequality anymore. I didn’t see the struggle women had, because in my world, those who caused the struggles were thought of as backward, ignorant and old-fashioned. I was outraged at any continued evidence of the "old school" but still assumed it was, in fact, old and on its way out.

I took auto, print, metal and wood shop instead of "home ec." I reasoned that I already knew how to sew and cook, so I should learn something new and different, and besides, I had grown up helping my grandfather out - I knew my way around a tool box, and around a car. I saw a host of different reactions when I ventured into that male-dominated world.

The wood shop teacher delighted in treating me as stupid, loudly pointing out any minor mistake I made before sending me unaided to fix my own error, while worse mistakes made by boys were calmly addressed and repaired with teacher assistance. My classmates took the cue, and treated me accordingly. I was an interloper, a second-class student. I deserved neither help nor recognition. I deserved only derision.

The print shop teacher thought it was more fun to haul out every border-line dirty joke he could recall and make anything and everything into sexual innuendo. All the while, however, he still treated me as if I could do the same job as the guys, it’s just that I had to be subjected to his sexualized humor. Once again, classmates took note and I had soon heard every sophomoric penis joke that existed.

Metal and auto shop were significantly different, however. Aside from an initial, and brief, period where it was assumed by all that I was taking the class in order to meet guys and some mild teasing, it quickly settled down to me being treated just as everyone else. The teachers of both classes quickly squashed any and all inappropriate behaviors. My fellow students soon did the same, allowing no one to cross that line ever again.

Such was my life experience when I trekked off to college, electing to enter the field of "technical" theater - meaning, I wanted to design the stages, run the shows and be "in charge". I had minimal interest in makeup, though I loved the FX and gore makeups (unlike the other girls in those classes, who endured them with an attitude of "if I must… but this is gross"). I endured costuming because I had to, especially since most of the time, we were relegated to hand washing smelly old vintage pieces, sewing trim onto oft-reused articles and designing imaginary wardrobes for shows we were not doing. I can’t draw - so I sucked at that part. But I digress.

My Stage Craft instructor actually told the girls in his 101 class (mandatory for all theater majors) that he did not expect them to learn to use power tools, but the guys had to. Ask me if I qualified on the power tools… Of course I did. And I continued on in Stage Craft, eventually changing the way the instructor dealt with 101 students.

I also learned that most girls weren’t too interested in the "management" positions, and that when a female was in a leadership role, it was very hard to get others to listen. Other women resent a woman in charge and men feel threatened by her. This was more of an education to me than the actual class work, since in my life, women were no different than men when it came to being "in charge".

I spent a year trying to make a go of "professional theater" at a time when women in my chosen field were a rarity. I earned less money than my male counterparts, but often worked harder and longer, and frequently turned out better results. Still, when it came time to staff a show, I was "second string" called only if the guys weren’t available. Men with less experience, less ability and less knowledge than I would be hired first.

Thus came a career change, but I did not step blithely into the world of the office. Nope. I elected to attend classes to become an EMT, and firefighter. The classes themselves were of interest, as I immediately noticed the male instructors sought to thin the class ranks by the telling of gross stories. At first, it seemed specifically geared to get rid of the women, but soon I realized it was just aimed at the well intentioned but squeamish.

At no point during my classes did the instructors treat any of the women differently than the guys. We were held to the same standards, we passed the same tests - no modified or reduced physical requirements for us. In fact, I strongly disagree with reduced physical requirements. Bottom line - if you can’t do what the job requires, find another job. Period. Fellow students could be a pain and the females in class had a lot more to "prove" than the guys.

Classes over, tests passed, I went to work and again discovered myself as a woman in a man’s world. The jokes flew: "That little ‘R’ on the steering column? It stands for ‘REALLY FAST’ you can use it when you have to go code." How many times my boots were stolen and hung from rearview mirrors I cannot count.

The guys in crew quarters seemed to assume I would do the cleaning. They were wrong.

They also made it their solemn duty to attempt to gross me out. Then I realized that I could simply utter two words that sent nearly any male running for cover: "Bloody tampon." It soon became a game - them trying to give me the willies, and me proving that I could out gross them all.

Once again I learned that women had to work harder than the men in order to get the same results. And it was all just considered "part of the job." It was the price you paid. You could also just forget about getting any supervisory position other than perhaps the shift supervisor on graveyard. It just didn’t happen. The guys got the choice assignments and didn’t like being partnered with a girl, not because she couldn’t do the work, but because it meant they were less likely to get the "good" stuff.

In the years there, putting up with all the garbage, dealing with the male-based favoritism and all of that, I only filed one charge of harassment. A male coworker made it his habit to barge into the bathroom (which couldn’t be locked) when he knew it was occupied. He would deliberately try to catch peeks while the girls were showering or changing in the crew quarters. He thought sexualized jokes were the best conversation starters.

All of that we all took with a grain of salt and blew him off as an asshole. But the day he took a gander down my uniform shirt while I was bent over cleaning my rig and commented on my choice of underwear, I’d had enough. I reported him.

His defense? He said, "She shouldn’t be wearing sexy underwear on the job. It’s distracting. I’m not harassing her, she’s harassing me by wearing that stuff." No joke. Yep. That was his claim. It’s not as if I paraded around in my personals. Nope - to get a glimpse, he had to either barge in while I was changing, or take a good long look while I was busy working.

Somehow, I came through all of that still unconvinced of the "need" for "feminism" and certain that modern feminism was actually hurting women more than helping them. Don’t ask. I don’t know. I still thought the battle was over, already won, and we were just in the rebuilding stages, trying to learn and define roles in the modern view of things.

OK, I was naive. What can I say?

Now, years later, I feel I am poised on an edge of some discovery, or perhaps rediscovery, of myself as a woman.

I’ve spent a lot of time surfing around, reading blogs and books, and I’ve discovered that to define the words "feminism" or "feminist" is nearly impossible. What one person considers "feminist" another thinks is mere pap. I’ve stumbled across those who make me truly wonder if they even understand the point, and equally, I’ve come across those "radical" ones who cause me to cringe at their man-hating ways.

You see, in my eyes, "feminism" doesn’t mean visiting every misogynistic practice back upon the patriarchal perpetrators. Sorry, today’s man is not responsible for yesterday’s stupidity and error.

I don’t hate men, and I don’t truly understand those who do - though I may understand the reasons behind the hatred in some cases. Nor am I out to "get back" at men, or feel the need to remove all use of the word "man" from the lexicon. All of that seems not only silly, but ultimately detrimental. I don’t think reversing the order and creating a matriarchal society where men are the subjugated ones is the answer to the woes of the world, or women.

I recognize there is a glass ceiling over my head - it is very real, and it exists for one simple reason: that I was born a woman. Is it fair, is it right? No, but it is reality. And changing that reality - without hatred - is closer to my "ideal" than anything else.

I think feminism is about choice - whether a woman decides to be a CEO of a multi-billion dollar corporation or a Domestic Goddess, caring for home, hearth and heart; whether she decides to have children, or not, to marry or not - all are equally valid choices, all should be honored, respected and admired.

In short, I don’t believe feminism is a one-size-fits-all shoe. There is no such thing.

And so this journey continues, my journey of heart, mind and soul. There is already a long list of bright and wonderful people who have helped me along the way - men who have proven that not all men think like Neanderthals; women who have been little shining lights along the path.

Tags: , , , ,

Powered by Qumana

Duluth will never be the same….

Anyone who knows, and I mean really knows, any of my immediate family (including Yours Truly here) and especially anyone who has ever seen us all together, knows that we’re a rather, ah… interesting group of people. Add to that equation a bit of alcohol and you might be in for a rollicking good time, or the most frightening time of your life, all depending upon your outlook.

As all of us gathered in the relatively quiet city of Duluth for Mom’s services, it occurred to me - that town will never be the same!

Funeral directors didn’t quite know how to handle a small and not so quiet bunch who, eyes red-rimmed from crying, spoke of a life of laughter and love - and they laughed together, celebrating a much as mourning. Nor did they know what to do about that same small bunch who, after all the others had left, started making funeral jokes. It’s just the way we deal with things. Hey, Mom taught us that laughter is as necessary as air!

The weather was wonderful - cold to us native Southern Californians, but still nice. The days were more clear than cloudy and there was no rain or snow. The people were nice - unerringly polite. But once again, within 24 hours, I had enough of that Northern accent to last me a lifetime. Ohhh, okay. Ya, sure, you betcha.

And so with that, a small collection of photos - our little family’s farewell to Mom!urn.jpg

That would be her… in that pic she’s still a teenager… And the roses? When she and Tom married, she had peach roses in her bouquet.

becca.jpg

tina.jpg

Yeah, those are my sisters… And if you really must know about the loverly shot on the anchor - ask, but I warn you, it’s a long story.

tomnharley.jpg

Mom’s hubby and my brother (yes, that young thing on the left is Mom’s hubby - yes, she “robbed the cradle.”)

asparklers.jpg

We gave Mom a proper send off - getting not-so-quietly toasted after the services, and traipsing out into the Minnesota night to wave some sparklers around (she liked the silly things, OK?)

twoharbors.jpg

A little sight seeing in Two Harbors…

stlouisriver.jpg

A great view of the St Louis River - from some rest area off the 35 (and ask me if I can recall the name of the darn rest area?)

bridge.jpg

Close to sunset - looking back from the lighthouse in Duluth. That’s the lift bridge. The terrific color comes not from PhotoShop, but from taking the picture through my sunglass lenses.